Economic Dependency-Based Employment Relations: The Establishment of a Hybrid Category as an Ius Constituendum for Indonesian Gig Workers
Keywords:
Gig economy Gig Worker Social Security Algorithmic managementAbstract
The rapid development of the gig economy in Indonesia has given birth to a paradox, on the one hand creating millions of job opportunities, but on the other hand perpetuating precarious working conditions under the legal fiction of “partnership”. Employment relationships that substantively contain elements of subordination through algorithmic management have systematically denied gig workers access to basic employment rights. This research aims to move beyond the identification of the problem by designing a concrete regulatory solution. The main focus of the study is to construct a model for a new hybrid legal category, “Economic Dependency-Based Employment Relations”, which is able to strike a balance between worker protection and the flexibility of digital business models. Using normative legal research methods enriched by conceptual approaches and comparative laws, this study formulates a detailed technical proposal. The result of this research is a regulatory construction that rests on three fundamental pillars. First, the Gig Economy Sectoral Minimum Wage Scheme, a dynamic formula that includes components of labor wages, real operating costs, and waiting time compensation. Second, the Tripartite Social Security Scheme, which requires proportional contributions from platforms, workers, and the state for the Employment Social Security Administration program through a digitally integrated mechanism. Third, the Portable Benefits Fund, a flexible paid leave system funded by the platform's mandatory contributions. Collectively, these three pillars form a comprehensive and implementable policy blueprint, offering an ideal middle ground to reform the labor law system to realize decent work for millions of workers in Indonesia's digital economy.
References
Aloisi, A. (2016). Commoditized Workers. Case Study Research on Labour Law Issues Arising from a Set of “On-Demand/Gig Economy” Platforms (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2637485). Social Science Research Network.
Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2022). Introduction—Your Boss Is an Algorithm. Artificial Intelligence, Platform Work and Labour (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4139319). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4139319
Annazah, N. S., Tobing, H., Habibi, N., & Fauziyah, F. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum dan Sosial bagi Pekerja Gig: Membangun Kerangka Regulasi yang Inklusif bagi Pekerja Ojek Online di Indonesia. Policy Paper Pusbangjaknaker, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.47198/pwp/v2i2-06
Bachtiar, P. P., Diningrat, R. A., Kusuma, A. Z. D., Izzati, R. A., & Diandra, A. (2020). Ekonomi Digital Untuk Siapa?: Menuju Ekonomi Digital yang Inklusif di Indonesia (Cetakan pertama). SMERU Research Institute.
Collins, H. (1992). Justice in Dismissal: The Law of Termination of Employment. Oxford University Press.
Dananjaya, I. K., Undari, N. K. A. S., & Halmadiningrat, I. M. (2023). Reformulasi Hubungan Kerja bagi Driver Online: Analisis Kekosongan Hukum untuk Mengkonstruksi Pekerjaan yang Layak. Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum Dan Keadilan, 26(01), 58–72.
De Stefano, V. (2015). The Rise of the “Just-in-Time Workforce”: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the “Gig-Economy.” International Labour Office.
Dubal, V. (2016). Wage Slave or Entrepreneur?: Contesting the Dualism of Legal Worker Identities. 105 Cal. L. Rev. 101 (2017), UC Hastings Research Paper No. 176.
Harris, S., & Krueger, A. (2015). Modernizing labor laws for twenty-first-century work: The "independent worker". https://apo.org.au/node/202926
Huda, N., Darmawan, A. D., Catherine, M., Agahari, W., Heeks, R., & Graham, M. (2023). Abour Standards in the Platform Economy: Fairwork Indonesia Ratings 2023. Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG).
International Labour Office. (2012). ILO Social Protection Floors Recommendation (No. 202).
International Labour Office. (2021a). Extending Social Security to Workers in the Informal Economy: Lessons from International Experience. Second (revised) Edition. International Labour Organisation (ILO).
International Labour Office. (2021b). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The Role of Digital Labour Platforms in Transforming the World of Work. International Labour Organisation (ILO).
International Social Security Association. (2022). ISSA Guidelines: Administrative Solutions for Coverage Extension. International Social Security Association.
International Social Security Association. (2025a). ISSA Guidelines: Contribution Collection and Compliance. International Social Security Association.
International Social Security Association. (2025b). ISSA Guidelines on Good Governance. International Social Security Association (ISSA).
Izza, S. R., Saharani, K. D., Ardiani, D., & Franssisca, M. L. (2024). Studi Literatur: Analisis Pengaruh Ragam Karakteristik Pekerja Ekonomi Gig terhadap Perekonomian Nasional. Journal of Regional Economics and Development, 1(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.47134/jred.v1i3.337
Laratmase, A. J., Suhendar, B., Kurniatha, A., Darma, A. S., Kiatin, D. R., & Rakian, J. M. (2025). Literasi Perlindungan BPJS Ketenagakerjaan bagi Pedagang Kaki Lima di Pusat Perkantoran DKI Jakarta. IJEEM - Indonesian Journal of Environmental Education and Management, 10(2), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijeem.v10i2.59046
Libby Reder, Steward, S., & Natalie Foster. (2019). Designing Portable Benefits: A Resource Guide for Policymakers. Aspen Institute. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Designing-Portable-Benefits_June-2019_Aspen-Institute-Future-of-Work-Initiative.pdf
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan ke-11. Kencana Prenamedia Group.
Mas, A., & Pallais, A. (2016). Valuing Alternative Work Arrangements.
Neufeind, M., O’Reilly, J., & Ranft, F. (2018). Work in the Digital Age: Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Packard, T., Gentilini, U., Grosh, M., O’Keefe, P., Palacios, R., Robalino, D., & Santos, I. (2019). Protecting All: Risk Sharing for a Diverse and Diversifying World of Work. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1427-3
Parrott, J. A., & Reich, M. (2018). An Earnings Standard for New York City’s App-based Drivers: Economic Analysis and Policy Assessment. Center for New York City Affairs & Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics.
Patel, S. (2022). Why Fee Caps on Food Delivery Platforms Won’t Help (and Will Likely Hurt) Small Restaurants.
Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Proposal for a Directive of The European Parliament and of the Council on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work (2021).
Reed, Lord, Hodge, Lord, Arden, Lady, Kitchin, Lord, Hamblen, Lord, & Leggatt, Lord. (2021). Uber BV and Others (Appellants) v Aslam and Others (Respondents).
Seth D. Harris & Alan B. Krueger. (2015). A Proposal For Modernizing Labor Laws For 21st Century Work: The “Independent Worker.” The Brooking Institution.
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.
Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury Academic.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).
Wahyudi, R., Sondakh, F., & Permatasari, V. N. A. (2024). Social Protection Inclusion in Indonesia’s Remote Areas—Identifying and Addressing Gaps and Challenges. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/41977
Weil, D. (2014). The Fissured Workplace: Why Work Became So Bad for So Many and What Can Be Done to Improve It. Harvard University Press.
