Women in the Gig Economy: Urgency of Gender-Sensitive Regulation for Women Gig Workers in Indonesia

Abstract

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, Indonesia’s labor structure has undergone a significant transformation, marked by a rise in the proportion of informal workers. Data from Statistics Indonesia (BPS, 2025) indicate that 59.4 percent of the total working population is employed in the informal sector, 64 percent of whom are women. This phenomenon may reflect the rapid expansion of the gig economy, which is supported by digital platforms offering services such as freelancing, ride-hailing, delivery, and other forms of app-based work. While the growth of the gig economy 
offers convenience and flexibility, in practice it often reinforces the precarity of women workers. Women in the gig economy frequently face issues such as the absence of formal employment status, gender-based discrimination, double burdens resulting from flexible work arrangements, and economic insecurity. The persistence of patriarchal culture and social constructions positions women gig workers as an oppressed group, even though they play a crucial role in sustaining both household 
and national economies. The proposed revisions to Indonesia’s Manpower Law, currently included in the National Legislative Program (Prolegnas), have yet to fully accommodate this critical issue. Therefore, it is imperative to emphasize the urgency of developing gender-responsive regulations either by refining existing labor laws or by formulating separate legislation specifically governing independent workers in the gig economy. The state must recognize independent workers as legal subjects within labor law and design gender-sensitive social protection schemes. Without policy 
interventions that prioritize their needs, women gig workers risk remaining trapped in a cycle of structural vulnerability.

References

Abdullah Sulaiman, et al. (2019). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan/Perburuhan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pendidikan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia.

Afrimadona, et al. (2022). Memaknai Kebijakan Berorientasi Manusia. Jakarta. Populi Center.

Arghajata. (2025). Tren Data Center di Indonesia di Masa Pandemic. Jakarta. [online] diakses pada:

https://www.arghajata.com/id/insight/2025/03/tren-data-center-di-indonesia-di-masa-pandemic/. [15 Oktober 2025]

Arivia, Gadis. (2018). Filsafat Berperspektif Feminis. Yayasan Jurnal Perempuan.

ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Trend Report No.19. (2025). Gig Economy, Rural Urban

Mobility, and Poverty in the POst-COVID-19 Era. 18-19.

Ayudiana, Shofi. (2025). BPS: Proporsi pekerja informal di Indonesia naik 59,40 persen. [online]

diakses pada :https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4814169/bps-proporsi-pekerja-informal-di-indonesia-naik-5940-persen. [15 Oktober 2025]

Australian Human Rights Commission. (2020). Respect@Work: National Inquiry into Sexual Harassment in Australian Workplaces. Sydney: AHRC.

Australia Parliament. (2022). Respect at Work Act 2022. Canberra: Federal Register of Legislation

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Proporsi Pekerja Lapangan Menurut Jenis Kelamin. [online] diakses pada

https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MjE1NSMy/proporsi-lapangan-kerja-informal-menurut-jenis-kelamin.html. [3 November 2025]

Bowles, P. & MacPhail, F. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on pathways from casual work to economic security: Canadian and international perspectives. Social Indicators Re- search, 88, 1-13.

Cherry, M. & Aloisi, A. (2021). “The Evolution of Platform Work Regulation in Europe”. International Comparative Labour Law Review, 8(2), 55–78.

Darmastuti; Rahmawati; Putri. (2022). Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan di Sektor Platform Digital Transportasi. Populi Center. 186-188.

De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the ‘Just-in-time workforce’: On-demand work crowdwork and labour protection in the ‘gig-economy’. ILO Publications.

Eurofound (2015), New forms of employment. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2022). Proposal for a Directive on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work. Brussels: EU Publications Office.

European Union. (2023). Directive on Platform Workers. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.

Gamble, S. (2010). Feminisme dan Posfeminisme. Jalasutra.

Gupta, R. (2020). “Interpreting POSH Act for Non-Traditional Workers.” Indian Journal of Labour Law, 15(3), 112–130.

Government of India. (2013). The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.

Government of India. (2020). Code on Social Security Act, 2020. New Delhi: Ministry of Labour & Employment.

Harahap, Arifuddin. (2020). Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Malang: Literasi Nusantara.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2025). Analysis of the Effect of Flexible Working Styles of Women’s Employment and Decent Work. 18, 31, 39, 65.

International Labour Organization. (2021). The Role of Digital Labour Platforms in Transforming the World of Work.Geneva: ILO.

Kallaberg, A.L. & Dunn, M. (2016). Good jobs, bad jobs in the gig economy. Perspectives on Work, 20, 10-13.

Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan (Komnas Perempuan) Laporan Tiga Tahun Pertama. (2001). 6.

Millet, Kate. Sexual Politics. USA: University of Illinois Press, 2000. 43.

National Commission for Women India. (2021). Guidelines on Protection of Women Gig Workers under POSH Act. New Delhi: NCW.

Prameswari, A. (2017). Ketidakadilan dalam Moralitas Relasional Kebijakan Penghukuman dalam Kasus Infantisida. Universitas Indonesia. 77, 80.

Satyam vs Union of India, Delhi High Court, (2020).

Sinaga, Saluchu. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Hak-Hak Pekerja dalam Hubungan Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Industri, Vol. 6.

State of California. (2019). Assembly Bill 5 (AB5): Worker Status – Employees and Independent Contractors. Sacramento: California Legislature

Stewart, A. & Stanford, J. (2022). “Regulating Work in the Gig Economy: Lessons from Australia.” Journal of Industrial Relations, 64(4), 579–596.

Tong, Rosemarie Putnam. (1998). Feminist Thought: Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Aliran Utama Pemikiran Feminis. JALASUTRA.

United Kingdom. (2010). Equality Act 2010. London: UK National Archives.

Uber BV v Aslam & others, UK Supreme Court [2021] UKSC 5.

Yuniastuti. (2020). Pola Kerja Kemitraan di Era Digital. Elex Media. 13.

How to Cite

“Women in the Gig Economy: Urgency of Gender-Sensitive Regulation for Women Gig Workers in Indonesia” (2025) Indonesia Forum on Labour and Productivity, 1. Available at: https://iflp.kemnaker.go.id/index.php/naker/article/view/36 (Accessed: 29 October 2026).