The Role of the Gig Economy in Driving Innovation and Market Efficiency: A Global Study Literature Analysis
Keywords:
gig economy work flexibility worker vulnerability labor market social protection labor policyAbstract
The gig economy has emerged as a transformative force in the global labor market, offering flexible, platform-based work models that drive innovation and efficiency. This study aims to analyze the dual role of the gig economy, focusing on its contribution to the national economy and the dualism between flexibility and vulnerability experienced by its workers. Through a global literature review approach with in-depth case studies of employment data in Indonesia, this study critically examines the dynamics that shape the contemporary gig economy.
The results of the analysis show that the gig economy has a significant contribution to labor absorption. In Indonesia, the number of full-time gig workers has increased dramatically from 2.3 million in 2019 to 4.4 million in 2024. For highly skilled workers, digital platforms open access to global markets, enabling them to earn higher incomes and serve as a stepping stone to permanent employment or entrepreneurship. This phenomenon is concentrated in urban areas, where the gig economy is the main driver of new job creation.
However, behind this flexibility lies systemic vulnerability. As many as 66% of gig workers express a desire to switch to formal employment but remain in their current jobs due to a lack of alternatives. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the trend of declining real income; for example, the average monthly income of gig workers in the transportation sector decreased from IDR 3.1 million in 2019 to IDR 2.6 million in 2024. Weak collective power and the absence of a social safety net are major challenges.
This study concludes that although the gig economy promotes market efficiency, it often sacrifices worker protection and stability. Therefore, comprehensive policy interventions are urgently needed, including legalizing the status of gig workers to close regulatory gaps, developing inclusive social security schemes, and strengthening upskilling programs to improve worker career mobility.
References
Adekoya, O. D., Mordi, C., Ajonbadi, H. A., & Chen, W. (2025). Implications of algorithmic management on careers and employment relationships in the gig economy – a developing country perspective. Information Technology & People, 38(2), 686–713. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2023-0064
Alauddin, F. D. A., Aman, A., Ghazali, M. F., & Daud, S. (2025). The influence of digital platforms on gig workers: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 11(1), e41491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41491
Albornoz, M. B., & Chávez, H. (2024). The challenges of gig economy and Fairwork in Ecuador.
Digital Geography and Society, 6, 100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2023.100073 Anggono, B. D., Wahanisa, R., Sari A.P, A. O. V. P., & Adiyatma, S. E. (2025). Interrogating the
Legal Foundations of Digital Transformation: Balancing Economic Growth and Social Welfare
in the Era of Disruption. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 191–211. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i1.12211
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2021). Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competition & Change, 25(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420914473
ASEAN. (2024). Study on the ASEAN Digital Economy Framework Agreement (DEFA). https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/DEFA-Report-public-summary-expanded_Final_25112024.pdf
Cameron, L. D. (2024). The Making of the “Good Bad” Job: How Algorithmic Management Manufactures Consent Through Constant and Confined Choices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 69(2), 458–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392241236163
Chan, N. K. (2022). Algorithmic precarity and metric power: Managing the affective measures and customers in the gig economy. Big Data & Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221133779
Dong, Z., Peng, J., & Liu, S. (2024). Gender Pay Gap in the Gig Economy. China Finance and Economic Review, 13(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2024-0001
Duggan, J., O’Sullivan, M., & O’Sullivan, M. (2023). Essential or excluded? Union pressures and state responses to platform work in three liberal market economies. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 29(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589241231731
Gauthier-Penhirin, A., & Acquier, A. (2025). A Cause Without Rebels? Exploring the Tensions Between Framing and Identity in the Mobilisation of Platform Workers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 40(3), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12330
Glavin, P., & Schieman, S. (2022). Dependency and Hardship in the Gig Economy: The Mental Health Consequences of Platform Work. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221082414
Gunawan, L. (2024). Exploring Impacts of Gojek Application as a Sharing Economy Tool on Indonesian Economics and Society: Systematic Literature Review Approach. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(4), 1390–1405. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3670
He, G., & Leurs, K. (2024). Platformed identities of female migrant domestic Ayi’s in the Chinese gig-economy. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i8.13739
Hilstob, K., & Massie, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Labour. Labour / Le Travail, 90, 223–
253. https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2022v90.009
HOWSON, K., USTEK-SPILDA, F., BERTOLINI, A., HEEKS, R., FERRARI, F., KATTA, S., COLE, M., AGUERA RENESES, P., SALEM, N., SUTCLIFFE, D., STEWARD, S., &
GRAHAM, M. (2022). Stripping back the mask: Working conditions on digital labour platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Labour Review, 161(3), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12222
Jurkowska-Gomułka, A., Piszcz, A., & Pais, S. O. (2024). Collective agreements on working conditions of solo self-employed persons: perspective of EU competition law. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 29(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.06
Khan, T. H., MacEachen, E., Premji, S., & Neiterman, E. (2023). Self-employment, illness, and the social security system: a qualitative study of the experiences of solo self-employed workers in Ontario, Canada. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 643. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15471-8
Kraus, K., & Kraus, N. (2025). Institutionalization of the Metaverse Based on the Development of the Exabyte Economy and Gig Economy. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 12(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.12.2.6-13
Lasek-Markey, M. (2024). Irish Supreme Court rules pizza delivery drivers are employees for tax purposes: What’s the takeaway for the gig economy in Europe? European Labour Law Journal, 15(4), 924–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525241261032
Li, M., Hu, X., Jin, K., & Han, J. (2025). Exploring factors influencing entry into the gig economy: A study of Chinese workers. Acta Psychologica, 259, 105301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105301
López-Martínez, G., Haz-Gómez, F. E., & Real Deus, J. E. (2023). Are You Really Your Own Boss? Flexi-Vulnerability and False Consciousness of Autonomy in the Digital Labor Culture of Riders. Social Sciences, 12(8), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080429
Low, M. P., & Wong, B. K. M. (2025). Understanding Gig Work in Paving Towards Gig Economy Sustainability: Insights from Platform-Based Companies. The Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, Vol 11(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.61211/mjqr110106
McDaid, E., & Free, C. (2025). Stories of resistance: The role of online forums in response to Uber’s algorithmic management. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 101, 102790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102790
Molitor, F. (2024). The Home as a Place of Work—Who Cares and Why? Social Sciences, 13(12), 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13120668
Muldoon, J., & Apostolidis, P. (2025). ‘Neither work nor leisure’: Motivations of microworkers in the United Kingdom on three digital platforms. New Media & Society, 27(2), 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231183942
O’Keeffe, P., & Papadopoulos, A. (2021). The Australian Government’s business-friendly employment response to COVID-19: A critical discourse analysis. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 32(3), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304621997891
Ojeda-Pereira, I. (2025). Securitizing the technoplatformized City: How delivery workers construct urban safe spaces in Chile’s gig economy. Digital Geography and Society, 9, 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100136
Panaligan, J. H., & Curran, N. M. (2022). “We are cheaper, so they hire us”: Discounted nativeness in online English teaching. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12543
Pawłowska, Z., Ordysiński, S., Pęciłło, M., & Galwas-Grzeszkiewicz, M. (2025). A Study of Working Conditions in Platform Work. Sustainability, 17(14), 6536. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146536
Permana, M. Y. (2025). Gig Economy: Potensi dan Proteksi. https://id.scribd.com/document/921964602/M-Yorga-Permana-Gig-Economy
Però, D. (2020). Indie Unions, Organizing and Labour Renewal: Learning from Precarious Migrant Workers. Work, Employment and Society, 34(5), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019885075
Pieczka, A., & Miszczyński, M. (2025). Meaningful app-work? Exploring meaningful work experiences of food delivery couriers in Poland. Central European Management Journal, 33(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-02-2024-0057
Purse, G. (2021). Policy Forum: Sagaz at 20—Evaluating Employment and Independent Contractor Relationships in a Changing World. Canadian Tax Journal/Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 69(2), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.2.pf.purse
Putri, T. E., Darmawan, P., & Heeks, R. (2023). What is fair? The experience of Indonesian gig workers. Digital Geography and Society, 5, 100072.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2023.100072
Sáenz-Leandro, R. (2025). The battle for TNCs in Latin America: navigating policy trends and sociotechnical controversies in the regulation of ride-hailing platforms. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2025.2495521
Sarker, M. R., Taj, T. A., Sarkar, M. A. R., Hassan, M. F., McKenzie, A. M., Al Mamun, M. A., Sarker, D., & Bhandari, H. (2024). Gender differences in job satisfaction among gig workers in Bangladesh. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 17128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68327-5
Siti Suraya Abdul Razak, & Abdul Shukor, S. F. A. S. (2025). REFORMING SOCIAL SECURITY PROTECTION FOR PLATFORM WORKERS IN MALAYSIA’S DIGITAL LABOUR
PLATFORMS. IIUM Law Journal, 33(1), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v33i1.1017 Stryzhak, O., Yermachenko, V., Cibák, L., & Sidak, M. (2025). Digitalisation of the Tourism Industry
and Self-Employment: Challenges of the Gig-Economy. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(1), 4.
https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6010004
Sutherland, W., Jarrahi, M. H., Dunn, M., & Nelson, S. B. (2020). Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019886511
Uchiyama, Y., Furuoka, F., & Akhir, M. N. M. (2022). Gig Workers, Social Protection and Labour Market Inequality: Lessons from Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 56(3). https://doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2022-5603-09
Vu, A. N., & Nguyen, D. L. (2024). The gig economy: The precariat in a climate precarious world.
World Development Perspectives, 34, 100596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100596 Wang, Q., & Churchill, B. (2025). Risky business: How food-delivery platform riders understand and
manage safety at work. Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 291–307.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833241246571
Wang, Y., & Zou, M. (2025). Platform Fissurisation and Regulatory Challenges in China’s Gig Economy: The Case of Food Delivery Platform Work. China: An International Journal, 23(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.56159/chn.2025.a953050
Wiesböck, L., & Radlherr, J. (2025). The interface gaze: on the (sexual) objectification of domestic workers in the gig economy. Feminist Media Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2025.2541273
Wolf, A. B., Coelho-Lima, F., Keppler, I. L. dos S., Ferreira, M. de S., Dall’Asta, C., Florez, M. E. R., & Figueroa, M. (2025). ‘Be Your Own Boss?’ Explaining Variation in Worker Response to the Gig Economy’s Ideology in the Global North and South. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(4), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12887
Wood, A. J., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2023). Platforms Disrupting Reputation: Precarity and Recognition Struggles in the Remote Gig Economy. Sociology, 57(5), 999–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221126804
Wu, P. F., Zheng, R., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Happy riders are all alike? Ambivalent subjective experience and mental well-being of food-delivery platform workers in China. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(3), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12243
Zeid, R., Alrayess, D., Ajwad, M. I., Soytas, M. A., & Rivera, N. (2024). The Gig Economy and the Future of Work: Global Trends and Policy Directions for Non-Standard Forms of Employment. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099060524074041161
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesia Forum on Labour and Productivity
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.