Ensuring Equity in Digital Labor Market: The Ministry of Manpower's Role in Expanding Social Protection for Gig Workers in Indonesia
Keywords:
gig economy ministry of manpower social protection equity digital labor marketAbstract
The rapid growth of the gig economy in Indonesia has created extensive work flexibility, particularly through digital platforms such as ride-hailing, courier services, and freelance jobs. However, behind this flexibility lies serious challenges, including income insecurity, the absence of formal labor protections, and limited access to social security programs. These conditions raise critical questions regarding the state's role, particularly the Ministry of Manpower, in ensuring equity and social protection for gig workers. This study aims to analyze the Ministry of Manpower's contribution in expanding social protection coverage and addressing policy gaps. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through analysis of policy documents, regulatory reviews, and interviews with gig workers. The interviewees include diverse gig workers from various sectors and representatives involved in policy implementation. The findings indicate that although initiatives exist to integrate gig workers into social security programs such as BPJS Ketenagakerjaan and BPJS Kesehatan, implementation remains limited. Constraining factors include the voluntary nature of enrollment, weak enforcement of regulations toward platform companies, and workers' low awareness of their rights to social protection. From a social justice perspective, the inability of the system to fully protect gig workers risks widening economic and social inequalities in the digital era. This study highlights the need for policy innovations, including mandatory contributions from digital platforms, subsidy schemes for low-income workers, and strengthened social protection literacy. Strengthening the Ministry of Manpower's role is essential to guarantee that Indonesia's digital labor market evolves inclusively, equitably, and sustainably.
References
Barus, S. I., Susanti, P., & Simamora, J. (2023). Legal Formulation On The Protection Of Labor Social Security (Jamsostek) For Gig Economy Workers. 1, 435–451.
Blázquez, M., Herrarte, A., & Moro-Egido, A. I. (2024). Well-Being Effects Of The Digital Platform Economy: The Case Of Temporary And Self-Employment. Sec. 30.
Ferdiandra, R., Yusdanial, D., Mustika, I. W., & Juda, E. (2024). Justice Social in the Age of Gig Economy : Reconstructing Legal Positivism to Draft Regulations Digital Jobs. Journal of Equity of Law and Governance, 7(1), 51–65.
Indra, & Nawangsari, S. A. (2025). Legal Protection for Gig Economy Workers from the Perspective of Labor Law in Indonesia. Judge: Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(1), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2289
Iqbal, M. A. S. N., Rokhim, A., & Utami, N. S. (2025). Legal Protection For Workers Gig Economy In The Platform Economy Era. International Journal of Cultural and Social Science, 6(2), 595-600.
Ishaq, M. S. H., Darmawan, D., & Sudjai. (2021). Gig Economy on Workers' Welfare and Labor Market Stability. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(2), 167–170.
Natow, Rebecca S. (2019). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077
Pilatti, G. R., Pinheiro, F. L., & Montini, A. A. (2024). Systematic Literature Review on Gig Economy: Power Dynamics, Worker Autonomy, and the Role of Social Networks. Administrative Sciences, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100267
Pugu, M. R., Sugiardi, S., & Thalib, B. (2025). Regulatory Challenges in the Face of the Gig Economy and Cross-Border Remote Work. 4(2), 299–306.
Setiawan, A. S. (2025). Reforming Gig Economy in Indonesia: A Sustainable Model to Support 8% Economic Growth. APINDO SMEs and Sustainability Journal. https://journal.apindo.or.id/assj/article/view/64%0Ahttps://journal.apindo.or.id/assj/article/download/64/2
Silaban, R., Ghafur, H. S., Widiawaty, D., & Basir. (2023). Eliminating the Gap of Labor and Social Protection for the Workers of Platform-Based Transportation. Justice, 12(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v12i2.69344
Sudirman, L., & Disemadi, H. S. (2023). Gig Economy: Unleashing the Potential of Digital Banking in Indonesia's Employment Regulations. Lantern Law, 10(2), 301–330. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v10i2.39688
Sugiyono, P. (2022). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods.
Tobing, H. (2024). The Gig Economy Dilemma: Exploring Alternatives to Create Decent Work for Online Motorcycle Taxi Drivers in Indonesia. Journal of Employment, 19(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.47198/jnaker.v19i2.340
Uchiyama, Y., Furuoka, F., & Akhir, M. N. M. (2022). Gig Workers, Social Protection and Labour Market Inequality: Lessons from Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economics, 56(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2022-5603-09
