Between Ideality and Reality: Social Protection for Ride-Hailing Drivers in Indonesia
Keywords:
gig economy social protection employment injury securityAbstract
The rapid growth of digital platforms in Indonesia has positioned ride-hailing drivers as a significant part of the gig workforce, yet their access to social protection remains limited. While the G20 and the International Labour Organization have emphasized inclusive and sustainable social protection for all workers, the translation of these ideals into practice shows persistent gaps in Indonesia. This paper explores workers’ compensation insurance for ride-hailing drivers, focusing on the employment injury security program (JKK) under BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Using qualitative analysis of social security data, literature review, and semi-structured interviews with drivers, the study identifies three critical
challenges. First, misclassification of workers persists, as platform companies label drivers as partners rather than employees, excluding them from mandatory coverage. Second, coverage remains extremely low: in 2023, only about 7.9% of the 2.3 million ride-hailing drivers were enrolled in JKK, leaving the majority without protection against work-related accidents. Third, algorithmic opacity limits drivers’ rights, as platform-controlled data on earnings and workload directly influences their ability to contribute to and benefit from social insurance. The findings highlight the gap between policy ideals and real conditions on the ground. To close this gap, the paper recommends: (i) revising regulations to ensure clearer classification of gig workers; (ii) expanding coverage beyond voluntary enrolment by introducing mandatory participation and targeted subsidies for low-income drivers; and (iii) requiring greater transparency from platforms to safeguard workers’ rights. Indonesia’s experience demonstrates the challenges of adapting traditional social protection frameworks to new forms of work, offering lessons for other emerging economies facing similar transformations.
References
BPS, (2023). Persentase Tenaga Kerja Formal Menurut Provinsi; Jakarta https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTE2OCMy/persentase-tenaga-kerjaformal-menurut-provinsi.html
BPJS Ketenagakerjaan (2024). BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Report. https://www.bpjsketenagakerjaan.go.id/laporan-terintegrasi.html
ILO. (2021). How to Improve working conditions for gig workers in Thailand. Leenoi, Prapan.
ILO. (2022). Protecting Workers in New Forms of Employment; China
ILO, ISSA, OECD (2023). Providing adequate and sustainable social protection for workers in the gig and platform economy; India
Hamdoun, S (202). Technology and the formalization of the informal economy. IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society; ISTAS, pp 85-90
Indonesia Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation
Indonesia Law Number 44 of 2015 concerning Work Accident Security and Death Security
Isbah, Falikul, M. (2019) Workers Right in the Digital Economy: Assessing the Impacts of Technology Usage by Go-Jek and Grab in Indonesia. Exploring the Nexus between technologies and human rigaht: Bangkok, SHAPE SEA
Izzati, Risfa, Nabiyla. (2023) Gig platforms have mushroomed in Indonesia in the past decade. But regulations have lagged, and it’s the workers who pay. The Diplomat; Jakarta https://thediplomat.com/2023/12/workers-lose-as-indonesian-laws-cant-keep-pacewithrideshare-apps/
Jaydarifard, Saeed. Behara, Krishna, Baker, Douglas, Paz, Alexander (2024), Driver fatigue in taxi, ride-hailing, and ridesharing services: a systematic review . Routledge, Reviews 44:3, 572-590
Nurdin, Akbar. (2024). Trapped in Unfair Platform economy; the experience of ride-hailing drivers in Jakarta. Institut of development studies. University of Sussex; Sussex
Prasetyo, E.H. (2022) Legitimacy building of digital platforms in the informal economy: evidence from Indonesia, Journal of Enterpreneurship in Emerging economies. 14(6). 1169-1187
OECD, (2021), Beyond COVID-19: Towards more inclusive and resilient social protection systmen; Riyadh https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@ddg_p/documents/publication/wcms_791889.pdf
OECD, (2020). What Have Platforms Done to Protect Workers during Coronavirus (COVID 19) Crisis? https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/what-have-platforms-done-to-protectworkers-during-the-coronavirus-covid-19-crisis-9d1c7aa2.html
Permana, M. Y., Izzati, N. R, Askar, M. W (2023) Measuring the gig economy in Indonesia: typology, characteristics, and distribution. SSRN Journal.
Romero, Lucas. (2024) Number of Ride-Hailing and Taxi users in Indonesia. Statista.com https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1383373/indonesia-ride-hailing-and-taxi-number-of-users
Qiao, S. Huang, G, Yeh, A.G-O (2023). Who are the gig workers? Evidence from mapping the identicalial locations of ride-hailing drivers by a big data approach. Cities 132, 104112
Webb, J. W., Tihanyi, L. Ireland, R.D., Sirmon, D.G (2009). You say illegal, I say legitimate: Enterpreneurship in the informal economy. Academy of Management review, 34(3), 492-510
World Bank (2023). The World Bank in Indonesia; www. worldbank.org
Yuana, Suci, Lestari. (2024), Contestation, Conflict, and Crisis in Transition: The Embedding of Ridesharing Indonesia ; ProefschriftMaken, The Netherlands
