Social Protection Gap for Blue-Collar Gig Workers in Indonesia: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Literature Review
Keywords:
blue-collar workers gig workers PRISMA protection gap social protectionAbstract
The rise of the digital economy in Indonesia has significantly increased the number of gig workers, particularly blue-collar workers in sectors such as transportation, construction, logistics, and mining. While offering flexibility, this employment pattern creates new vulnerabilities, including a substantial social protection gap characterized by limited access to social security, health insurance, occupational accident coverage, and income security. This study aims to map the social protection gap among blue-collar gig workers in Indonesia through a PRISMA-based Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Major databases including Scopus and Google Scholar were searched for publications between 2015 and 2025, with inclusion criteria covering studies on gig work, social protection, and the Indonesian context. The analysis reveals that most labor and welfare policies remain oriented toward formal workers, leaving blue-collar gig workers largely excluded from comprehensive protection schemes. Despite the rapid expansion of platform-based employment, existing regulations have not been sufficiently adapted to address non-standard forms of work. Policy implementation also faces structural challenges such as fragmented responsibilities among institutions, uneven platform compliance, and workers’ limited awareness of rights and entitlements. Furthermore, disparities in coverage across sectors highlight the urgent need for context-specific strategies that address the heterogeneity of gig workers’ experiences. This study highlights the critical urgency of evidence-based policy reform to extend social protection coverage, while also underscoring the necessity of stronger collaboration among government bodies, digital labor platforms, and worker organizations. Academically, the findings contribute to the discourse on labor transitions in the digital era and provide a foundation for comparative studies across developing economies. Practically, the results inform policymakers and stakeholders in designing inclusive and sustainable social protection systems that safeguard vulnerable workers in Indonesia’s evolving digital economy.
References
Alisjahbana, A., Yusuf, A. A., Aurino, E., & Tiberti, L. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on gig workers' livelihoods in Indonesia: Evidence from a large-scale survey. Journal of Asian Economics, 82, 101520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101520
Allen, K., & Ayalon, L. (2023). Platform precarity: Occupational health and safety risks among gig economy workers in Southeast Asia. Safety Science, 161, 106074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106074
Balaram, B., Warden, J., & Wallace-Stephens, F. (2017). Good gigs: A fairer future for the UK’s gig economy. Royal Society of Arts. Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U., & Silberman, M. S. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work: Towards decent work in the online world. International Labour Office (ILO).
Broughton, A., Green, M., Rickard, C., Swift, S., & Biletta, I. (2018). Employment and working conditions of selected types of platform work. Eurofound. Ford, M., & Honan, V. (2017). The Go-Jek effect: Gig economy and its impact on Indonesian labour market. In Labour and Development in Southeast Asia (pp. 189–208). Routledge.
Hadiz, V. R., & Yulianto, V. (2022). Platform capitalism and labour control in Indonesia's gig economy. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 52(3), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2021.1941540
Heeks, R. (2020). Digital labour platforms and development: New frontiers of the gig economy. Information Technology for Development, 26(4), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1621236
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2021). World social protection report 2020–22: Social protection at the crossroads – in pursuit of a better future. International Labour Office.
Jamil, S., & Dutta, S. (2021). Understanding precarity in South Asia’s gig economy: Workers’ vulnerabilities and coping strategies. Asian Journal of Social Science, 49(2), 179–201.
Koutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A. M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the gig economy and its regulatory challenges. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.237
Kuhn, K. M., & Maleki, A. (2017). Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and instaserfs: Understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3),
183–200.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2019). Independent work: Choice, necessity, and the gig economy in Asia. McKinsey & Company.
Meagher, K., & Spohr, M. (2021). Informality and inequality in digital labor markets in developing countries. Development and Change, 52(5), 1023–1047.
OECD. (2021). The future of social protection: What works for non-standard workers? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1786-323
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pratomo, D. S. (2019). Do gig workers in Indonesia have adequate social protection? Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 14(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.47198/naker.v14i2.xxx
Rani, U., & Furrer, M. (2020). Digital labour platforms and new forms of flexible work in developing countries: Algorithmic management of work and workers. Competition & Change, 25(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420914473
Rosser, A., Priyambudi, S., & Prayoga, B. (2021). Precarious work and the gig economy in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 38(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae38-1e
Sargeant, M., & Giovannone, M. (2021). The employment status of platform workers in Europe: Developments and perspectives. European Labour Law Journal, 12(4), 505–528.
Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Polity Press.
Suryahadi, A., Al Izzati, R., & Suryadarma, D. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 outbreak on poverty: An estimation for Indonesia. SMERU Working Paper. SMERU Research Institute.
Tjandra, S. (2016). Labour law and development in Indonesia. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(2), 383–408.
Vandaele, K. (2021). Will trade unions survive in the platform economy? Emerging patterns of platform workers’ collective voice and representation in Europe. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 27(3), 301–317.
World Bank. (2022). Protecting all: Risk-sharing for a diverse and diversifying world of work. World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/37464
