The Legal Status of Gig Workers in Indonesia: Between Independent Partnersand Employees in the Perspective of Labour Law
Keywords:
gig workers legal status employment relationship labour protection Dependent contractorAbstract
The rapid growth of the digital economy in Indonesia has given rise to the phenomenon of gig workers, including online ride-hailing drivers, delivery couriers, and digital freelancers. While platform-based work provides a high degree of flexibility, it also raises serious concerns regarding the legal status of its workers. At present, gig workers are categorized as “partners” by platform companies rather than employees, thereby excluding them from the protection of labour law. This legal ambiguity exposes workers to vulnerabilities such as the absence of social security, lack of entitlement to fair wages, and the risk of unilateral termination. In practice. This study aims to analyze the legal status of gig workers in Indonesia by examining existing labour regulations, the digital contracts applied by platform companies, and comparative approaches adopted in other countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Spain. The research employs a normative-juridical method through statutory analysis, contractual examination, and case studies, complemented by relevant international literature. The findings indicate a significant regulatory gap. Gig workers cannot be fully classified as employees, yet they cannot be treated as entirely independent contractors either. Consequently, this paper recommends the establishment of a new legal category, namely gig workers or dependent contractors, which combines work flexibility with fundamental labour protections. This proposed regulation should be incorporated into labour law reforms or specific implementing regulations. This research is expected to provide practical contributions for national labour policy formulation and enrich academic discourse on labour law in the digital economy era.
References
Canada Labour Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. L-2.
Caruso, L. (2014). The political economy of digital labour: From global value chains to platform capitalism. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12(2), 480–501.
De Stefano, V. (2020). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labour protection in the gig economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 41(2), 471–504.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. Geneva: ILO.
Kato, R., Haruyama, Y., Endo, M., Tsutsumi, A., & Muto, T. (2014). Heavy overtime work and depressive disorder among male workers. Occupational Medicine, 64(8), 622–628.
Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2022). Laporan ekonomi digital Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Kominfo.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Nurhadi, E., & Sari, M. (2022). Socio-economic implications of online transportation work in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Employment Studies, 5(3), 214–230.
Prassida, D., & Yuniarto, P. (2021). Flexible work and precarity in Indonesia’s gig economy. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 18(2), 101–112. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja, Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.
Putri, R., Rahmawati, S., & Arifin, M. (2023). Legal interpretation of employment relations in Indonesia’s platform economy. Journal of Labour Law and Policy, 9(1), 33–47.
Rachmawati, N., & Suwandi, E. (2020). Partnership or employment? Legal dilemmas of platform-
based work in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 543–559.
Setiawan, B., & Amalia, R. (2020). Economic insecurity and digital labour platforms in Indonesia. Journal of Development Studies, 56(9), 1651–1663.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press. Spain “Rider’s Law”, Royal Decree-Law No. 9/2021.
Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420–437.
Stoeber, J., Davis, C. R., & Townley, J. (2013). Perfectionism and workaholism in employees: The role of work motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 733–738.
Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5 (United Kingdom Supreme Court).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
